The hundred-year language
This time, i´'ll talk about "The hundred-year language". an article made by Paul Graham.
The main idea of this article, is like to guess how the programming language could be in one hundred years in the future. so, can you imagine how programming language could be in a hundred years or more, from now?
Well, that's a really difficult question, because well, we arr talking about predicting future is difficult. People, countries, technogoly and a lot of thing can change in a few years, and when someone puts on the table a hundred years, i cant even imagine.
But Paul Graham talks about which language could disappear sooner. A language Paul mention is Java and I've read that Java is slowly dying, so the author could be correct. For a language to "survive", has an option an it is to combine with another newer. A problem for language, is that they are very slowly to improve because they are not a technology by themselves.
An important think Paul mentioned, is that the simplier the core, the better the language is and that the bigger and the more and more robust the hardware is, it becomes different and will try to trade with diffetrent things, so technology will change.
When more and more years are passing, new languages will appear to substitute old and obsolete language, so if the danger of extintion languages dont act quickly, they will absolutely disappear, so they will have to quickly evolve to improve(that i think is very improbable by the reason i said some lines before) or to join with another one, which i think is the better solution in different ways.
The main idea of this article, is like to guess how the programming language could be in one hundred years in the future. so, can you imagine how programming language could be in a hundred years or more, from now?
Well, that's a really difficult question, because well, we arr talking about predicting future is difficult. People, countries, technogoly and a lot of thing can change in a few years, and when someone puts on the table a hundred years, i cant even imagine.
But Paul Graham talks about which language could disappear sooner. A language Paul mention is Java and I've read that Java is slowly dying, so the author could be correct. For a language to "survive", has an option an it is to combine with another newer. A problem for language, is that they are very slowly to improve because they are not a technology by themselves.
An important think Paul mentioned, is that the simplier the core, the better the language is and that the bigger and the more and more robust the hardware is, it becomes different and will try to trade with diffetrent things, so technology will change.
When more and more years are passing, new languages will appear to substitute old and obsolete language, so if the danger of extintion languages dont act quickly, they will absolutely disappear, so they will have to quickly evolve to improve(that i think is very improbable by the reason i said some lines before) or to join with another one, which i think is the better solution in different ways.
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario